Authors express their conflicted feelings about the use of their books in training generative AI systems without permission or compensation, highlighting the need for proper citation and recognition of their work Read The Full Article
Key Points
1. Author David Meerman Scott discovers that his books, along with 183,000 other books, were used by Meta, Bloomberg, and others to train generative AI systems without permission or citation credit.
2. Scott acknowledges his support for AI but raises concerns about the unauthorized use of his paid content, as it is used in ways that he did not authorize or benefit from.
3. Other authors, artists, and creators also express concerns about their work being treated as raw material by powerful corporations
Key Insight
The use of books and other creative works without permission in AI training sets raises questions about copyright infringement and the appropriate recognition of authors’ efforts
Why This Matters
This article sheds light on the ethical and legal issues surrounding the use of authors’ and creators’ work in AI systems without permission or proper citation. It underscores the need for clear guidelines and standards to protect intellectual property rights and ensure fair compensation for content creators in the age of AI
Notable Quote
David Meerman Scott’s wife, Yukari Watanabe Scott, describes the situation as “A Frankenstein Monster of Stolen Art,” emphasizing the disregard for the creators’ work in AI systems
