GNAI Visual Synopsis: A courtroom scene with judges and lawyers engaged in discussions, symbolizing the evolving regulations and oversight around the use of AI in legal practices.
One-Sentence Summary
The article, published on JD Supra, discusses the increasing regulation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in legal practices, with courts and governing bodies taking steps to address its use in court filings. Read The Full Article
Key Points
- 1. Courts are responding to the surge of generative AI use in court filings by instituting standing orders and proposing requirements, such as mandating certifications related to the use of AI.
- 2. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has announced a proposed requirement that would necessitate a certification regarding the use of generative AI in court filings.
- 3. Individual judges in various states, including Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Hawaii, and Oklahoma, have issued standing orders regulating the use of generative AI in court filings.
- 4. The changes in rules and standing orders across courtrooms indicate a growing patchwork of regulations governing generative AI use in litigation.
Key Insight
Courts and governing bodies are moving to establish regulations and certifications to oversee the use of generative AI in legal practices, particularly in court filings, in response to the rapid adoption and expansive use of AI technologies.
Why This Matters
The increasing regulation of generative AI in legal practices highlights the need to ensure accuracy and oversight in AI-generated documents, presenting a cautionary reminder for all litigators about the necessity to verify and cross-verify the output of generative AI. This development also reflects broader concerns and conversations around AI ethics, transparency, and accountability in professional and legal settings.
Notable Quote
“Even beyond rules and standing orders by specific judges, by explicitly drawing in Rule 11, such existing rules and standing orders present a cautionary tale for all litigators about the need to verify and cross-verify the output of generative AI.”
